Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ariz. App. 577 - Hoeffel v. Campbell

16 Ariz. App. 577 - Hoeffel v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1986
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. Linsenmeyer · Boyce v. Brown · State v. Madden · 8 Ariz. App. 101 - Zakroff v. May · 8 Ariz. App. 327 - Dykeman v. Ashton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Court does note that the instructions were set forth in haec verba in the abstract of record and that- pursuant to> written motion the appellants did include the challenged instructions in an appendix to its reply brief after appellee’s answering brief had pointed out appellants’ failure. Under the facts of this case the Court has determined that, notwithstanding appellants’ failure to comply with Rule 5(b) 10, it will consider the alleged instructional error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.