16 Ariz. App. 592 - State v. Dominguez’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1975
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. McCallister · 13 Ariz. App. 507 - State v. Smith · 15 Ariz. App. 174 - State v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A.R.S. Sec. 36-1002.02(A) clearly states: “ . . . every person who transports, imports into this state, sells, furnishes, administers or gives away, or offers to transport, import into this state, sell, furnish, administer, or give away, or attempts to import into this state or transport any narcotic drug other than marijuana except upon the written prescription of a physician, osteopath, dentist, or veterinarian licensed to practice in this state shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison from five years to life, and shall not be eligible for release upon completion of sentence, or on parole, or on any other basis until he has served not less than five years in prison.” (Emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gaddy“shall not be eligible for release upon completion of sentence, or on parole, or on any other basis until he has served not less than [a certain number of] years”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Deddens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.