Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 ARKAPP 108 - Womack v. Womack

Womack v. Womack’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pryor v. Pryor · Boyles v. Boyles · Bachus v. Bachus · Russell v. Russell · McCue v. McCue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Pryor v. Pryor, 88 Ark. 302 , 114 S.W. 700 (1908), the court said: “The court is not, in the first instance, bound by the agreement of the parties concerning the amount of alimony to be allowed to the wife.” The Court explained the matter in this way: “This is so because the court is moved to action by principles of justice and equity, and is not bound to follow the agreement of the parties against what appears to be the justice of the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The parties to a divorce action may agree upon the alimony or maintenance to be paid. Although the court is not bound by the litigants’ contract, nevertheless if the court approves the setdement and awards support money upon that basis there is then no power to modify the decree at a later date.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.