Chandler v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1991
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Winston v. Robinson · McFadden v. Griffith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c)(1) The results of the tests shall be receivable in evidence. (2) A written report of the test results by the duly qualified expert performing the test, certified by an affidavit duly subscribed and sworn to by him before a notary public, may be introduced in evidence in illegitimacy actions without calling the expert as a witness. If either party shall desire to question the expert in those cases where he has performed the blood tests, the party shall have him subpoenaed within a reasonable time prior to trial. (3) The experts shall be subject to cross-examination by both parties after the court has caused them to disclose their findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ross v. Moore“(b) The tests shall be made by a duly qualified physician or physicians, or by another duly qualified person or persons, not to exceed three (3), to be appointed by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ross v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.