Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Beeler 353 - Barber v. Barber

Barber v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 1981
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1981

10 state decisions

4019431950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"There is no reason why a judgment should not be rendered on an allowance for alimony, which is a debt— any more than an ordinary one. The Court below, in its sound discretion, which is not ordinarily reviewable by this Court, under the motion of plaintiff in this cause can hear the facts, change of conditions of the parties, the present needs of 'support of any of the children and, in its sound discretion, render judgment for what defendant owes under the former judgment and failed to pay and see to it that such judgment is given to protect plaintiff”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.