Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Beeler 56 - Anderson v. Armstrong

Anderson v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
September 1974
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 1974

9 state decisions

701943195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Should plaintiff recover judgment on the trial of this case on its merits, the judgment will be restricted in its scope so that execution thereunder can only be levied on property of defendant not directly and exclusively used in the work of the trust, that is property subject to taxation.” 180 Tenn. at page 61 , 171 S.W.2d at page 402 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.