Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Cal. 207

Chamberlin v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860

California Supreme Court · decided 1860-07-01

<p>Appeal from the Seventh District.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1961

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1860-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

¶1Field, C. J. concurring.

¶2Where an appeal regularly taken is dismissed for want of prosecution, the dismissal operates as an affirmance of the judgment, and a second appeal cannot be allowed. The only mode of avoiding the consequences of such dismissal is to move, during the term or before the remittitur has gone out, to vacate the order and reinstate the cause. The appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

¶3See Karth v. Light (15 Cal).

/16/cal/207 · .json · Public domain