16 Cal. App. 310 - Corey v. Struve’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 1974
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Higgins v. California Petroleum & Asphalt Co. · Kilgore v. Bulkley · Ankeny v. Young Bros. · Union Ins. Co. v. Am. Fire Ins. Co. · Callahan v. Stanley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It could not be said with any show of reason that they contracted with reference to a custom of which one of the parties was ignorant. 'Evidence of usage is admissible only on the ground that the parties who made the contract were both cognizant of the usage and must be presumed to have made their engagements with reference thereto.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Stults“farming ... includes the cultivation and fertilization of the soil as well as the caring for and harvesting of the crops.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Stults“A contract is to be interpreted according to the law and usage of the place where it is to be performed. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Stults
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.