Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 CALAPP2D 141 - MacFarlane v. Farwell

MacFarlane v. Farwell’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Fish v. Security-First National Bank (1948), Estate of Scherer (1943)

24 state decisions

90193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cox v. Schnerr · Hotaling v. Hotaling · 19 Cal. App. 428 - Bacon v. Soule · Knight v. Tripp · In Re Estate of Nutt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “confidential relations are presumed to exist between priest and parishioner,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in the last stages of cancer, drugged with opiates for several weeks.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.