Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 CALAPP2D 519 - Muller v. Stiegeler

Muller v. Stiegeler’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1950
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Estate of Higgins · 130 Cal. App. 725 - In Re Estate of Fritz · Frink v. Heirs of Hedrick · In Re Estate of Carr · Muller v. Stiegeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “committed to the sound discretion of the probate court and its conclusion will not be set aside in the absence of a showing of an abuse of discretion. (Estate of Carr, 175 Cal. 387 [ 165 P. 958 ]; Estate of Hedrick, 127 Cal. 184 [ 59 P. 590 ]; Estate of Miller, 15 Cal.App. 557 [ 115 P. 329 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.