16 Cal. App. 4th 1649 - Friddle v. Epstein’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably 110 Cal. App. 4th 156 - Lieberman v. KCOP Television, Inc. (2003), Deteresa v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (1997)
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 51 Cal. 3d 1130 - In Re Marriage of Arceneaux · 51 Cal. 3d 202 - Kimmel v. Goland · 38 Cal. 3d 355 - Ribas v. Clark · 8 Cal. 3d 67 - Rakestraw v. Rodrigues · 59 Cal. 2d 577 - Beazell v. Schrader
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties thereto, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering or in' any legislative, judicial, executive or administrative proceeding open to the public, or in any other circumstance in which the parties to the commu nication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(a) Any person who has been injured by a violation of this chapter may bring an action against the person who committed the violation for the greater of the following amounts: (1) Five thousand dollars ($5,000). (2) Three times the amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff. (c) It is not a necessary prerequisite to an action pursuant to this section that the plaintiff has suffered, or be threatened with, actual damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vera v. O'KEEFE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.