Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 330

94 P.3d 475

Docket No. S124914.

Jasmine Networks v. SEMICONDUCTOR

JASMINE NETWORKS v. MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2004.

California Supreme Court · decided 2004-07-21

Decided 2004-07-21

¶1Julian William Mack, Buchalter Nemer et al., San Francisco, CA, David J. Rude, Clark & Rude LLP, San Jose, CA, for Defendants and Respondents.

¶2James McManis, Jessica Irene Valenzuela Santamaria, McManis Faulkner & Morgan, San Jose, CA, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

¶3Review granted/briefing deferred (rule 29.1).

¶4Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp., S123808 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court.

¶5GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

/16/calrptr3d/330 · .json · Public domain