Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 COLO 165 - Carpenter v. Innes

Carpenter v. Innes’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
December 1922
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1922

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

201891190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilde v. Rawles · Parks v. Wilcox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule has been established that replevin will lie’ in any state court of competent jurisdiction in favor of one who is the owner of goods which had been seized by the sheriff, or any other officer, upon a writ against a third person, where the suit in which the writ issued has been brought in any other of the courts of the state.” (p. 166.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.