Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 E.H. Smith 422 - Rodgers v. . Clement

16 E.H. Smith 422 - Rodgers v. . Clement’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
January 1974
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 1974 · most notably Fayerweather v. Ritch (1904), Jacobson v. . Brooklyn Lumber Co. (1906)

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

14019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedRodgers v. Clement

Relationships

Relies on Trustees of Amherst College v. Ritch · Marston v. . Swett · In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of James · Fleischmann v. . Stern · 15 E.H. Smith 530 - Woerz v. . Schumacher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the moneys advanced by the plaintiff to the firm were contributions of capital or additions to plaintiff's capital, then he was not entitled to interest on the same, since he must rely upon the profits of the business to compensate him for the investment, unless there was a special agreement between the partners that interest should be allowed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.