Mutzenbecher v. Ballard’s Empirical Analysis
16 F.2d 173 · 1925
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1976
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rumely v. United States · Miller v. Rouse · Cowokochee v. Chapman · In re Miller · Munich Reinsurance Co. v. First Reinsurance Co. of Hartford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the Alien Property Custodian has made a disposition of seized property of an enemy alien, including the adjustment of an alleged claim, such settlement cannot be attacked by the enemy alien, nor has the enemy alien any standing in a suit brought against the one with whom the Alien Property Custodian has settled.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.