Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 F.2d 206 - The Washington

The Washington’s Empirical Analysis

16 F.2d 206 · 1926

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably Herrera v. First Northern Savings & Loan Ass'n (1986), Weedon v. Gaden (1969)

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

70192619301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lent v. New York & Massachusetts Railway Co. · Polleys v. Black River Improvement Co. · Radford v. Folsom · Rubber Company v. Goodyear · Mattoon v. McGrew

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Rendition’ of judgment means the ‘annunciation or declaring of the decision of the court,’ and not the ‘entry of the judgment upon the record.’ Fleet v. Youngs, 11 Wend. (N. Y.) 522 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the delivery of the thing filed into the actual custody of the proper officer keeping the records of the court. It connotes a deposit for permanent presentation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Entry ... is ordinarily synonymous with recording. It connotes a duty greater than, or additional to, that preservation which is the essence of filing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.