Rice v. Eisner’s Empirical Analysis
16 F.2d 358 · 1926
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1988
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Anderson · Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka · United States v. Mitchell · Lynch v. Turrish · Commonwealth of Virginia v. State of West Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The complaint did not ask for interest upon the sum which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue refunded before suit brought, nor was there a motion to amend the pleading during the trial. That would in our judgment be final in any case, * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Steiner v. Nelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.