Kendrick v. Kendrick’s Empirical Analysis
16 F.2d 744 · 1926
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York (1941), Fuller v. Volk (1965)
35 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Julian v. Central Trust Co. · City of Dawson v. Columbia Avenue Saving Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co. · Barney v. Baltimore City · Smith v. Adams · Stewart v. Dunham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a)n existing suit within the court's jurisdiction is a prerequisite of an intervention, which is an ancillary proceeding in an already instituted suit”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an existing suit within the court's jurisdiction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.