de la Llana-Castellon v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
16 F.3d 1093 · 1994
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Dia v. Ashcroft (2003), Abdulai v. Ashcroft (2001)
46 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 556 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Goldberg v. Kelly · Armstrong v. Manzo · Morgan v. United States · Landon v. Plasencia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“due process require[d] the BIA to give Petitioners advance notice and an opportunity to be heard”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“An agency's discretion to take administrative notice depends on the particular case before it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.