Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 F.3d 1101 - United States v. Mintz

United States v. Mintz’s Empirical Analysis

16 F.3d 1101 · 1994

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2023

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Abney v. United States · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin · United States v. Cardall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the ultimate goal [of the two conspiracies] was to mix the two types of marijuana for sale in New York and that [the two conspiracies] were interdependent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ultimate goal ... to mix the two types of marijuana for sale in New York.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “core conspirators ... coordinated the entire plan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.