Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 F.3d 1223

Docket No. 91-3986.

United States v. Smith

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-12-07

Relies on United States v. Custis · United States v. Robert Tate

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-12-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2025

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

801993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Before: JONES, RYAN, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

¶1

One of the issues raised in this appeal is the refusal of the District Court to consider whether certain of defendant's prior convictions are constitutionally valid. Our recent en banc decision in United States v. McGlocklin, No. 91-6121, --- F.3d ----, 1993 WL 356406 (6th Cir., Sept. 17, 1993) (en banc) requires that issue be addressed. We vacate the judgment and remand that issue to the District Court for consideration in light of McGlocklin.1

¶2

Accordingly, it is so ORDERED.

1

On October 12, 1993, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Custis v. United States, 988 F.2d 1355 (4th Cir.1993), cert. granted 62 U.S.L.W. 3272, No. 93-5209 (Oct. 12, 1993), an opinion relied upon by the plurality in McGlocklin

/16/f3d/1223 · .json · Public domain