Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 F.3d 287

Docket No. 93-2525.

Laughter v. Speight

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 1994. Decided Feb. 9, 1994.

2 counsel of record

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523

Relies on Laughter v. Speight (In re Speight)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Morris Sheppard Arnold · Decided 1994-02-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2013

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Jimmy D. Eaton of Little Rock, AR.

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was William J. Butt of Fayetteville, AR.

Before BEAM and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and STROM,* Chief District Judge.

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

¶1

This is a core proceeding that arose in a voluntary bankruptcy proceeding under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. At issue is the dischargeability of a judgment entered against the debtor by the Chancery Court of Benton County, Arkansas. Under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(4), a debt for "fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity ..." is not dischargeable. We agree with the district court1 that the judgment in question, 147 B.R. 489, rendered in the context of an accounting on dissolution of a partnership, was quite plainly based on a finding that the debtor had committed a defalcation in the context of a fiduciary relationship. Indeed, the judgment says specifically that Speight "breached his fiduciary duty to Laughter."

¶2

We agree, too, with the district court's conclusion that the fifteen-page judgment of the state court contained all that was necessary to establish, under well-known principles of collateral estoppel, that the judgment debt was not dischargeable.

¶3

We therefore affirm the district court on the basis of its well-reasoned opinion below.

*

The HONORABLE LYLE E. STROM, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation

1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas

/16/f3d/287 · .json · Public domain