Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 F.3d 330 - Malik v. Brown

Malik v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

16 F.3d 330 · 1994

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Shakur v. Schriro (2008), May v. G.h. Baldwin (1997)

13 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

1501994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Turner v. Safley · Wisconsin v. Yoder · O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz · In re Disbarment of Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[l]awful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation of many privileges and rights, a retraction justified by the considerations underlying our penal system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so-called religions which ... are obviously shams and absurdities and whose members are patently devoid of religious sincerity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a valid, rational connection between the prison regulation and the legitimate government interest put forward to justify it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.