United States v. $2019339 US Currency’s Empirical Analysis
16 F.3d 344 · 1994
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably United States v. Alcaraz-Garcia (1996), Bank of America, N.A. v. Moglia (2003)
8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1963 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 981 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean Society · United States v. Four Million, Two Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand · United States v. Reckmeyer · United States v. Campos · United States v. Lot 111-B, Tax Map Key 4-4-03-71(4)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he federal courts have consistently held that unsecured creditors do not have standing to challenge the civil forfeiture of their debtors' property.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.