16 F. 3d 408 - Acosta v. Urbanik
16 F3d 408 Acosta v. Urbanik
Ralph ACOSTA, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Mr. URBANIK; Larry Moody; Mr. Erickson, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-6843.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 21, 1994.
Decided Feb. 1, 1994.
16 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-91-410-AM).
Ralph Acosta, appellant Pro Se.
Paula Pugh Newett, Office of the United States Atty., Alexandria, VA, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Acosta v. Urbanik, No. CA-91-410-AM (E.D. Va. July 19, 1993).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We deny Acosta's motion for appointment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir.1984)
Advertisement