Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 F.3d 408

Docket No. 93-6895.

Cochran v. Jt Hadden

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993. Decided Jan. 11, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Browning v. New Elk Coal Company

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-408-HC-H).

Robert Morris Cochran, Petitioner Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cochran v. Hadden No. CA-93-408-HC-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 1993). We deny Appellant's requests for appointment of counsel and a hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/16/f3d/408 · .json · Public domain