Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 F.3d 445 - Zelman v. Gregg

Zelman v. Gregg’s Empirical Analysis

16 F.3d 445 · 1994

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 31 U.S.C. § 3125

Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Esch v. Yeutter · Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision · Hahn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[pjrior to bringing suit, the Zelmans had requested replacements from the Bureau of Public Debt which administers the savings bond program for the Treasury. In reply the Bureau told the Zelmans the following: first, government records showed the bonds to have been redeemed more than ten years ago; second, government regulations create a presumption that redeemed bonds have been properly paid if no claims have been filed within ten years of redemption; and third, since the government now retains no other records after ten years has elapsed following redemption, “no details regarding ... redemption [of the Zelmans’ bonds] can be furnished.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We are reluctant to overturn the district court in a civil suit based on a disaggregation theory not raised in that court____ Accordingly, we are disposed to affirm the district court but without prejudice to the Zelmans’ filing of a new suit in the same district court if they wish to pursue their disaggregation theory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.