James v. Garland’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Holland v. Florida · Maria Dulce Pena Luis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Higgs v. Attorney General of United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder well-settled principles of administrative law, we must accept or reject the agency's decision based on the rationale the agency provides.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“our review is limited to the grounds the [agency] offered for its decision”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Khalil v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.