Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Ga. App. 23

Parker v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1915

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1915-02-18

<p>Complaint; from city court of Jefferson — Judge Johns. December 16, 1913.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1928

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1915-02-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Russell, C. J.

¶1There was circumstantial evidence which authorized the inference that the plaintiff acquired title to the note subsequently to its maturity, and that for that reason he was not a bona fide purchaser. The charge of the court was a full, fair and able presentation of the law applicable to the case, and, when considered as a whole, was not subject to any of the exceptions presented in the motion for a new trial. For that reason the verdict approved by the trial judge will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, J., not presiding.Complaint; from city court of Jefferson — Judge Johns. December 16, 1913.A. 0. Brown, John J. & Boy M. Strickland, for plaintiff.G. C. Thomas, T. J. Shackelford, W. M. Smith, P. Cooley, for defendant.
/16/gaapp/23 · .json · Public domain