¶1Where the grounds of a motion for a new trial are dependent upon a consideration of the evidence, and a brief of the evidence has not been prepared in even substantial compliance with section 6093 of the Civil Code, this court will not attempt to review the discretion of the trial judge in overruling such grounds. Grier v. Brown, 118 Ga. 670 (45 S. E. 455); Wall v. Mercer, 119 Ga. 346 (46 S. E. 420); Gairdner v. Tate, 121 Ga. 253 (48 S. E. 907); Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga. 139 (75 S. E. 254); Albany &c. R. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga. App. 270 (64 S. E. 1114). Judgment affirmed.
16 Ga. App. 310
Anthony v. Wingfield
Decided May 7, 1915
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1915-05-07
<p>Complaint; from city court of Washington — Judge Wynne. July 11, 1914.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1936
1 state decisions
Relies on Whitaker v. State · Albany & Northern Railway Co. v. Wheeler · Wall v. Mercer
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1915-05-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →