Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 HOWPR 77 - Houghton v. Ault

Houghton v. Ault’s Empirical Analysis

1858

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Frost & Dickinson v. Brisbin · In re Thompson · In re Wrigley · In re Wrigley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here is much more propriety in requiring a debtor, whose domicile is without the state, to give security for the debt, than one whose domicile is within. Such a debtor, pending litigation, might sell his property, and remain at home, in which event he could not be reached by any of the provisional remedies or supplementary proceedings provided by [New York] laws.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.