Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ill. App. 3d 1071 - Brown v. Burdick

16 Ill. App. 3d 1071 - Brown v. Burdick’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 1990
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 1990

22 state decisions

140197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 22 Ill. 2d 432 - Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. · 32 Ill. 2d 40 - Roth v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd. · 78 Ill. App. 2d 53 - Chavez v. ELGIN, JOLIET & EASTERN RAILWAY CO. · 26 Ill. 2d 501 - Inskip v. Trustees, Univ. of Ill. · 57 Ill. App. 2d 271 - Tidwell v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In the actions specified in this Act or any other act or contract where the time for commencing an action is limited, if judgment is given for the plaintiff but reversed on appeal; or if there is a verdict for the plaintiff and, upon matter alleged in arrest of judgment, the judgment is given against the plaintiff; or if the plaintiff is nonsuited, or the action is dismissed for want of prosecution then, whether or not the time limitation for bringing such action expires during the pendency of such suit, the plaintiff, his heirs, executors or administrators may commence a new action within one year or within the remaining period of limitation, whichever is greater, after such judgment is reversed or given against the plaintiff, or after the plaintiff is nonsuited or the action is dismissed for want of prosecution." (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 83, par. 24a.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.