Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ill. App. 3d 724 - Marcus v. Wilson

16 Ill. App. 3d 724 - Marcus v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently November 1993 · most notably George Fuller Co Division of Northrop Corporation v. Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine (1983), 108 Ill. App. 3d 723 - La Rocco v. Bakwin (1982)

6 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

340197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 1 Ill. App. 3d 890 - Zamouski v. Gerrard · Dill v. Widman · 8 Ill. 2d 494 - McCartney v. McCartney · Cameron v. Boeger · 3 Ill. App. 3d 1015 - Anastos v. O'BRIEN

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . an exception to the general rule allowing only a direct attack on a judgment exists when a party seeks to prove that a judgment was procured through fraud or collusion. (Shapiro v. DiGuilio (1968), 95 Ill.App.2d 184 , 237 N.E.2d 771 .) Fraud vitiates every transaction, even when robed in a confessed judgment. (Hughes v. First Acceptance Corp. (1931), 260 Ill.App. 176 .)” Id. at 560.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) existence of a valid contract; (2) knowledge by defendants of the existence of the contract; (3) inducement by defendants to the other party to breach said contract; and (4) damages resulting from the breach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.