16 Ill. App. 3d 830 - People v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1993
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Byrne v. Karalexis · Galax Mirror Co. v. United States · 34 Ill. 2d 402 - The PEOPLE v. Ashley · United States v. Lovano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where two or more co-defendants are represented by the same counsel, some specific instance of prejudice, some real conflict of interest, resulting from the joint representation must be shown to exist before it can be said that one of the defendants has been denied effective assistance of counsel.” (People v. Richardson, 16 Ill. App. 3d 830, 833 , 306 N.E.2d 886, 889 .)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.