Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ill. App. 3d 842 - People v. Carter

16 Ill. App. 3d 842 - People v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 1980
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · 45 Ill. 2d 269 - The People v. Hammond · 37 Ill. 2d 295 - The PEOPLE v. Pridgen · 46 Ill. 2d 114 - The People v. Slaughter · 125 Ill. App. 2d 237 - People v. McElroy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) For the purposes of this Section a defendant is unfit to stand trial or be sentenced if, because of a mental or physical condition, he is unable: (1) to understand the nature and purpose of the proceedings against him; or (2) to assist in his defense. (b) The question of the defendant’s fitness may be raised before trial or during trial. The question of the defendant’s fitness to be sentenced may be raised after judgment but before sentence. In either case the question of fitness may be raised by the State, the defendant or the court. (c) When a bona fide doubt of the defendant’s fitness to stand trial or be sentenced is raised, the court shall order that a determination of that question be made before further proceedings. (d) When the question of the defendant’s fitness to stand trial is raised prior to the commencement of trial, the question shall be determined by the corut, or by a jury. The defendant or the State may request a jury or the judge may on his own motion order a jury. When the question is raised after commencement of the trial, the question shall be determined by the court. # a « (g) If requested by the State or defendant, the court shall appoint a qualified expert or experts to examine the defendant and testify regarding his fitness. The corut shall enter an order on the county board to pay the expert or experts.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.