Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Ill. App. 3d 989 - People v. Howell

16 Ill. App. 3d 989 - People v. Howell’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2017

18 state decisions

9019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 79 Ill. App. 2d 174 - People v. Lillie · 54 Ill. 2d 165 - People v. Hendrix · 54 Ill. 2d 161 - People v. Kent · 113 Ill. App. 2d 231 - People v. Cook · 133 Ill. App. 2d 827 - People v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This change makes it clear that a person must either be charged initially by grand jury indictment or given a prompt preliminary hearing before being held to answer for a crime punishable by death or by imprisonment in the penitentiary.” 7 Record of Proceedings, Sixth Illinois Constitutional Convention 2600.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““No person shall be held to answer for a crime punishable by death or by imprisonment in the penitentiary unless either the initial charge has been brought by an indictment of a grand jury or the person has been given a prompt preliminary hearing to establish probable cause.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The constitutional reference to a right to a preliminary hearing is new. As we read the provision before us it appears to be designed to insure that the existence of probable cause will be determined promptly either by a grand jury or by a judge.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.