Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Ind. 39

Moorman v. Barton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1861

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1861-05-27

<p>APPEAL from the Wayne Common Pleas.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1873

1 state decisions

Relies on Brown v. Perry · Indianapolis Insurance v. Brown · Collins v. Makepeace

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1861-05-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Suit on note. Answer: 1. Denial. 2. Payment. 3. That usurious interest was contracted for. 4. That usurious interest had been paid. Beply to the second, and demurrer sustained to the third and fourth paragraphs of the answer. Both the third and fourth paragraphs thus pleaded profess to answer as to the whole, when in fact, they neither of them show a bar, if true, but as to a part of the cause of action.

Wm. A. Bielde and Chas. U. Burehenal, for the appellants.James Perry, for the appellee.

¶2The demurrers were therefore correctly sustained. 13 Ind. 448; 6 Blackf. 378; 5 id. 424; 14 Ind. 32; 11 id. 268; id. 527.

¶3The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.

/16/ind/39 · .json · Public domain