Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Ind. App. 698

Mills v. Byram

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1896

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1896-12-02

<p>From the Marion Superior Court.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1900

2 state decisions

Relies on Dodge v. Morrow

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1896-12-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lotz, C. J.

¶1The only question arising on this appeal is presented by a bill of exceptions. There is a bill of exceptions in the record, *699signed by the presiding judge, but there is no certificate of the clerk showing that the bill was ever filed in the court below, or that the bill was a part of the proceedings in the court below. The clerk of the trial court should duly certify to the transcript and to all documents and papers which were a part of the proceedings in the court below, and which he transmits to this court. Without such certificate under the seal of that court this court has no means of knowing whether or not the record presented is the one upon which the court below rendered the judgment. Dodge v. Morrow, 14 Ind. App. 534.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/16/indapp/698 · .json · Public domain