Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 Kan. 608 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1876

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 1976

16 state decisions

2018761880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a man commits what he knows to be an immoral act, he ought to be required to take the entire-consequences of such act, although he may not have been fully advised as to all the circumstances connected with the act. In fact, when a man sets out willfully to do an immoral act, he ought to be bound to know all the circumstances connected with such act. Such a person is in no proper condition to plead innocence.” (p. 611.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.