16 Kan. App. 2d 280 - State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““(c) ‘Drug paraphernalia’ means all equipment, products and materials of any kind which are used or intended for use in planting, propagating, cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing, compounding, converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing, packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting, ingesting, inhaling or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance in violation of the [ 16 Kan. App. 2d 283 ] uniform controlled substances act. ‘Drug paraphernalia’ shall include, but is not limited to: (9) Capsules, balloons, envelopes and other containers used or intended for use in packaging small quantities of controlled substances.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 30 Kan. App. 2d 1148 - State v. Lundquist