Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Ky. 7

Frowman v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 1, 1800

Court of Appeals of Kentucky · decided 1800-07-01

<p>A person discharged from a prosecution for felony, without a trial on the merits, cannot, in an action for malicious prosecution, require proof of probable cause, until he shows express malice.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2016

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1800-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Opinion of the Court, by

Ch. J. Muter.

¶2THE presentment against Mary Smith having been found by the grand jury, and she having been discharged therefrom, for reasons which appeared to the court, and not acquitted of the charge contained therein, by a trial thereof on the merits, the court is of opinion that, on the trial of the action for a malicious prosecution, it was not incumbent on the defendants to show a probable cause, but that it was essential to the support of the plaintiffs’ action, that they should have proved express malice in the defendants; which not having been done, judgment reversed with costs.

/16/ky/7 · .json · Public domain