Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 La. 251

Boler v. Day

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1840

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1840-10-15

This is an action of slander, for slanderous words charged to have been spoken by the defendant, maliciously and with a view to slander, defame and injure the plaintiff in his good name and character. The plaintiff alleges that he has sus(ained great injury in consequence of this slander, and prays judgment for twenty thousand dollars in damages, and a trial by jury.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1840-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1909

3 state decisions

101840185018601870188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Simon, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The appellee filed a written motion to dismiss this appeal, on the ground that the transcript does not contain the records *253of the case, sufficient for this court to revise the judgment, complained of.

¶3This is an action of slander, in which the verdict of the jury was given in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff, after having vainly attempted to obtain a new trial, took the present appeal.

¶4The clerk, in one of his certificates annexed to the record, certifies that the testimony of several witnesses whom he names, and which had been taken down by him, was lost from the papers in open court, together with the answer filed by the defendant, and on a careful examination of the record, we find that a part of the evidence taken down by the clerk is copied in the transcript, but that there is no statement of facts, and nothing to show that the clerk was required to take down the testimony adduced by either of the parties.

¶5In this imperfect state of the case, it is certainly impossible for us to revise the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court, rendered thereon; the appellant, however, has made application that the case be remanded, but he has made no showing to that effect. Had he made a motion for a certiorari, it would have been useless, as the answer and a part of the parole evidence appear to have been lost, and from the evidence which the record shows, it does not. appear to us that justice requires that this cause should be remanded for a new trial.

¶6It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that this appeal be dismissed, with costs.

/16/la/251 · .json · Public domain