16 Md. 352
Decided July 11, 1860
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1860-07-11
The bill, in this case, filed on the 8th of June 1857, by the appellants against the appellees, alleges, that before the intermarriage of the complainants, the said Mary loaned money to the said Ann, who had a separate estate, consisting of real and leasehold property, to assist the said Ann in improving her property; that a part of the money was returned and the note of the said Ann, for $62.32, was given to the Said Mary for the balance, and the bill prays that the said…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1908
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1860-07-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1delivered the opinion of this court.
¶2The clepree appealed from dismissed the bill, upon the *357ground, that the judgment presented in defence is a proper set-off against the claim of the complainants. Believing, as we do, that the circumstances disclosed by the record are ¡sufficient to sustain the decision below, the decree will be affirmed. See Smith & Talbott vs. Donnell, 9 Gill, 89. Ferris, et al., vs. Burton, 1 Vermont Rep., 439, 455.
¶3Decree affirmed, with costs to the appellees.