16 Md. App. 511 - Doye v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2014
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California · Gilbert v. California · Holt v. United States · Sugarman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule is well established that physical evidence need not be positively connected with the accused or the crime to be admissible; it is admissible where there is a reasonable probability of its connection with the accused or the crime, the lack of positive .identification affects only the weight of the evidence. Woodell v. State, 2 Md. App. 433 , 234 A. 2d 890 [1967]; Tomolillo v. State, 4 Md. App. 711 , 245 A. 2d 94 [1968].””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The prohibition of compelling a man in a criminal court to be witness against himself is a prohibition of the use of physical or moral compulsion to extort communications from him, not an exclusion of his body as evidence when it may be material.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘It is also relevant to show that the defendant owned or had access to any article with which the crime was or could have been committed. [Emphasis added].’ ” Citing 1 Wharton, Criminal Evidence, (12th ed.) § 203 at 408.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.