Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 MICH 169 - Rorabacher v. Lee

Rorabacher v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1867

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 1930
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1930

7 state decisions

4018671870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““by this reference it became an essential part of the defendant’s contract (upon which the suit was brought), without which the meaning and effect of the proviso in that contract could not be understood.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.