Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

16 Neb. 666

Daniels v. Tibbets

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1884

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1884-07-15

<p>1. Final Order. A finding by the district court that the allegations of a petition are confessed to be true by a defendant who is in default for want of an answer is not a final order or judgment.</p> <p>2. -. To obtain a review of a case in this court there must be a final judgment upon the merits of the case in the court below.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1884-07-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1964

3 state decisions

10188418901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Reese, J.

¶1This is a proceeding in error to the district court of Lancaster county. Defendant in error has filed in this court a motion to dismiss the proceeding for the reason that there has been no judgment rendered or final order made in the court below.

¶2Upon an examination of the transcript we find the following entry made in the district court: “The defendant herein elects to stand on his demurrer heretofore overruled by the court, and excepted to at the time. And now comes the plaintiff by counsel, and the defendant being in default for want of an answer, the court finds the allegations of the petition are confessed by him to be true.”

¶3This appears to be the last and only entry of the district court upon its records which in any way attempts to finally dispose of the case. It is neither a final order or judgment as defined by section 581 of the civil code. It is *667simply a formal finding of fact without proof. Such a proceeding cannot be reviewed by this court. To obtain a review in this court there must be a final judgment upon the merits of the case in the court below. Riddle v. Yates, 10 Neb., 510. Nichols, Shepherd, & Co. v. Hail, 5 Neb., 194.

¶4The motion to dismiss is sustained and the cause dismissed.

¶5Judgment accordingly.

The other judges concur.
/16/neb/666 · .json · Public domain