16 Neb. Ct. App. 27 - State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Anderson · State v. Gutierrez · State v. Fischer · State v. Leibhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If you find that [the defendant] intended to [assault/injure/kill] a person other than [victim] and by mistake or accident [assaulted/injured/killed] [victim] the element of intent is satisfied, even though [the defendant] did not intend to [assault/injure/kill] [victim]. In such a case, the law regards the intent as transferred from the original intended victim to the actual victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. RUNNELS v. STATE“If you find that [Moore] intended to do wrong, but as a result of his actions an unintended wrong occurred as a natural and probable consequence, you must find that [Moore] is guilty even though the achieved wrong was unintended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore“A person commits the offense of assault in the first degree if he intentionally or knowingly causes serious bodily injury to another person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.