State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Molina · State v. Nissen · State v. Gales · State v. Robinson · 128 S. Ct. 166 - Perez v. Oakland County, Michigan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The testimony of a person who is the victim of a sexual assault, as charged in this case, does not require corroboration. It is for you to decide what weight to give the testimony of [M.C. and K.S.].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schmidt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.