Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 N.J. 430 - In Re Backes

In Re Backes’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1976
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1976

6 state decisions

40195419601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 129 N.J. Eq. 42 - Shaffer v. Shaffer · 107 N.J. Eq. 538 - Pahy v. Pahy · 142 N.J. Eq. 759 - Duerner v. Duerner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law regards these actions which tend to disrupt the marriage status with regret — certainly it does not encourage them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.