Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 16 NM 59 - Kingston v. Walters

Kingston v. Walters’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1995

17 state decisions

40191119201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Insurance Company v. Mowry · Swain v. Seamens · 1 E.H. Smith 402 - Thomson v. . Poor · Faxton v. Faxon · Clark v. Dales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a representation as to the future relates to an intended abandonment of an existing right, and is made to influence others, and they have been influenced by it to act, it operates as an estoppel.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.